How Can Christians Still Support Trump?

Understanding the Christian Conservative Perspective on Trump's Conviction

Well, it’s been an interesting two weeks, right? If you haven’t been following, Trump was convicted of numerous felonies related to falsifying business records to conceal a hush payment, all while running for the presidency. Such actions, if true, constitute a crime.

I’m not going to delve into whether I think he’s innocent or guilty. There are enough voices discussing that, and frankly, I think it’s divisive. Opinions vary widely depending on whom you ask. As it stands, he was convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers.

Bridging the Political Gap

What I want to do is bridge the gap between those celebrating his convictions and those grabbing their bug-out bags, fearing America’s collapse. I believe both reactions are problematic and wrong.

One of the biggest confusions I see from the left is how people can still support a convicted criminal for the presidency of the United States. I want to try to explain that. I am not trying to change minds, just trying to help answer the question or confusion.

Context and History

First, you need context and history. Conservatives believe in a small government because they see it as a necessary evil. If the government becomes too big and powerful, it will eventually become corrupt. This is the lens through which conservatives view things, explaining their usual opposition to more government spending or programs.

Now, I’m not saying conservatives aren’t corrupt. I think most Republicans are corrupt, which is why I, just so you know my perspective, am a libertarian and not a Republican.

From the start, most conservatives do not trust the government, whereas most Democrats believe the government is the solution to the nation's problems. This is why Democrats support increased government spending on programs like food stamps or initiatives for the homeless. Conservatives, however, would prefer churches or private parties handle charity.

Christian Conservatives

This brings us to Christian conservatives, where I think most of the left is the most confused. How can Christians support a convicted criminal? Isn’t there moral hypocrisy here? No, there isn’t, and I’ll explain why.

Christians believe that Jesus Christ is God. Way back when, Jesus was charged with several offenses by Jewish leaders and the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, including:

Blasphemy: Claiming to be the son of God.
Violating the Sabbath: Healing people on the Sabbath.
Threatening the Jewish Temple: Allegedly threatening to destroy the Temple.
Sorcery: Accused of practicing sorcery and exorcising people using demons.
Claiming to be the King of the Jews: Tried for this charge.

Jesus was crucified, executed as a convicted criminal. If you missed it, the Christian God was also a convicted criminal and was punished by death.

Views on Legal Reform

Another aspect of why some conservatives continue to support Trump, despite his convictions, lies in their perspective on the laws he violated. Many conservatives believe that some of the laws Trump is convicted of violating shouldn’t exist in the first place. They see these laws as part of an overly complex and burdensome legal system that stifles freedom and economic growth.

For example, Trump was convicted of falsifying business records to hide a hush payment. Many conservatives view the laws surrounding business regulations and campaign finance as overly restrictive and often selectively enforced. They argue that these regulations create unnecessary obstacles for business owners and political candidates, leading to a system where only those who can navigate the complex legal landscape succeed.

Conservatives often call for a comprehensive overhaul of the legal system, advocating for fewer regulations and simpler, more transparent laws. They believe this approach would reduce corruption and ensure that laws are applied more fairly. The conviction of Trump, in their eyes, highlights the need for legal reform rather than the need for more laws to convict people.

By pointing to examples like excessive business regulations, conservatives argue that the current legal framework often criminalizes actions that should not be criminalized. They believe that reforming the legal system to reduce unnecessary regulations would prevent similar convictions in the future and create a more just and equitable society.

Trump and Conservative Support

No, Trump is not God, nor is he even close. However, if Christians praise and worship a God who was a convicted criminal and punished by death 3,000 years later, it’s not too hard for that same group of people to support a mere human who falsified business records. It’s not a huge leap.

Biblical Obedience

But wait—doesn’t the Bible say to obey the governing authorities? Yes and no. In a nutshell, Christians are to obey governing authorities unless such obedience requires them to violate their moral obligations as Christians. For example, if a law, like one permitting abortion, violates their moral obligations, they can and should become dissidents. God is King—not the American government, not our president, and not Trump or Biden. Christians' loyalty is to Christ alone.

Good vs. Evil in Christian Belief

To further understand the unwavering support some Christians have for Trump, it’s important to delve into the Christian belief in good versus evil. Christians believe that the world is a battleground between good and evil forces. This worldview significantly impacts their political beliefs and actions.

Christians see themselves as part of a spiritual war against evil, which they believe manifests in various forms, including political corruption, moral decay, and societal injustices. This belief system influences their political choices, often leading them to support leaders who they perceive as fighting against these evil forces, even if those leaders are flawed.

For instance, many Christians support Trump because they see him as standing against what they perceive as moral and societal decay promoted by the political left. They believe that supporting him, despite his flaws and convictions, is a way to combat greater evils.

God Uses Broken People

Another key aspect of Christian belief that influences political views is the understanding that God continually uses broken people to further His cause. Throughout the Bible, God often chose individuals with significant flaws to lead and accomplish His purposes. This pattern provides a powerful context for understanding why some Christians support leaders who may have personal failings.

Moses: Moses, one of the most revered figures in the Bible, was a murderer before God called him to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. Despite his past, God used him to deliver His people and establish His laws.
David: King David, described as a man after God’s own heart, committed adultery and murder. Yet, he was chosen by God to be the king of Israel and was instrumental in uniting the kingdom and preparing the way for the construction of the temple.
Paul: The Apostle Paul, originally known as Saul, persecuted Christians before his dramatic conversion. He went on to become one of the most influential apostles, writing a significant portion of the New Testament and spreading Christianity throughout the Roman Empire.
Peter: Peter, one of Jesus’ closest disciples, denied knowing Jesus three times during His trial. Despite this, Jesus forgave him and chose him to be a foundational leader in the early Christian church.

These examples illustrate that God’s work is not hindered by human imperfections. In fact, God’s strength is often highlighted through the weaknesses of those He chooses to use. This belief underpins why many Christians can support leaders like Trump, viewing his flaws not as disqualifying, but as an opportunity for God’s grace to manifest.

By recognizing that God can use anyone, regardless of their past or their failings, Christians may see their support for Trump as consistent with the biblical narrative of redemption and divine purpose. This perspective helps bridge the gap between those who question how a Christian can support a convicted criminal and those who view such support as a natural extension of their faith.

Conclusion

Understanding the Christian conservative perspective on Trump’s conviction requires a deep dive into their worldview and religious beliefs. From the historical context of government distrust to the biblical examples of God using flawed individuals for His purposes, it becomes clearer why some Christians support Trump despite his legal troubles. Their support is not about condoning crime but about seeing the bigger picture of redemption, grace, and the ongoing battle between good and evil. By acknowledging these factors, we can better understand the complex and often misunderstood reasons behind their political choices.

Drawing the Line: Protecting Eugene Youth in Times of Change

In an era of rapid societal transformation, the roles of parents and educators have never been more critical. As we navigate these times of change, it becomes paramount that we, as guardians and mentors, take a firm stand to protect the interests and well-being of our youth. The responsibility to draw clear boundaries is not just an option—it is a necessity.

The Value of Boundaries in Youth Development

Boundaries are essential in guiding young people through their formative years. They provide a sense of security and structure, which are crucial as they navigate the complexities of growing up. In the current cultural climate, where pressures regarding identity and personal choices can be overwhelming, setting these boundaries is particularly vital. Our children look to us for guidance; they need to know that it's okay to slow down and that not all decisions need to be rushed.

The Surge in Identity Changes Among Youth

A particularly poignant example of where boundaries are needed is in the treatment of gender identity issues among adolescents. Recent years have seen a significant rise in young people seeking to change their genders. While it is important to support individuals in finding their true selves, there is a profound difference between understanding and encouragement and rushing into irreversible decisions.

Adolescence is a time of exploration, but it is also a period marked by confusion and impressionability. As adults, it is our duty to ensure that actions taken during this vulnerable phase do not lead to regrettable consequences in adulthood. This means advocating for thorough psychological assessments and insisting on the involvement of medical professionals who are balanced in their approach, prioritizing long-term well-being over immediate affirmation.

The Role of Adults in Times of Change: Affirming Reality and Upholding Truth

In an ever-evolving society, the role of adults—be it as parents, educators, or community leaders—extends beyond mere supervision; it involves a proactive approach to safeguarding the mental and emotional well-being of our youth. This responsibility becomes even more critical as societal norms and values undergo rapid changes, often blurring the lines between subjective feelings and objective reality. It is here, in the midst of this confusion, that adults must assert their role not only as caretakers but as steadfast beacons of truth and reason.

Upholding Objective Reality in a Subjective World

The modern cultural landscape, especially with regards to identity and personal expression, has increasingly favored a subjective interpretation of reality. While so called experts say it is vital to recognize and validate the feelings and experiences of individuals, there is a dangerous precedent set when subjective feelings completely dictate reality without a grounding in objective truth. As guardians of the next generation, it is our duty to affirm reality and ensure that our youth can distinguish between how they feel and what is true.

In the context of gender identity, for example, the rush to affirm any and all expressions can lead to confusing and often contradictory messages. The role of the adult is not to diminish or dismiss the struggles and feelings of youth but to guide them with compassion grounded in reality.

The Necessity of Saying 'No'

Saying 'no' is often seen as negative, especially in an age where affirmation is frequently equated with support. However, 'no' is a powerful word that can act as a necessary boundary that protects. It is not about denying rights or suppressing voices but about safeguarding against hasty decisions that could have lifelong consequences. Adults must be courageous enough to say 'no' when it means protecting a child from irreversible choices that they may not be mature enough to make.

For instance, when a teenager expresses a desire to undergo significant medical treatments to alter their gender, it is an adult’s responsibility to ensure that these desires are explored with thorough medical and psychological evaluations, considering all the potential long-term impacts. It involves discussing the full spectrum of what such decisions entail, including the risks and irreversible nature of certain procedures.

Speaking Truth in Love

To speak the truth is an act of love, particularly when it involves difficult truths that challenge popular narratives. Adults must balance empathy with honesty, understanding with guidance. This balance is crucial in helping youth navigate their formative years with confidence and clarity. We must be prepared to discuss complex issues without resorting to simplifications that serve only to appease or placate.

Speaking the truth also means confronting delusions—not to belittle, but to bring clarity and aid in understanding. It involves reinforcing that while personal feelings are valid, they do not always align with external realities. It is a delicate task to affirm the worth of the individual while also affirming the truths of the world around them.

Conclusion

In times of change, the role of adults is more crucial than ever. We must be pillars of truth in a sea of relativism, providing a stable foundation on which our youth can build their lives. Saying 'no,' guiding responsibly, and affirming reality are not acts of resistance against change but are the very essence of our duty to protect and educate the young minds entrusted to our care. In doing so, we equip them not just to survive in a changing world, but to thrive with integrity and authenticity.

Advocating for Thoughtful Approaches

Drawing the line means advocating for policies and practices in our schools and communities that truly consider what is in the best interests of all students. It means demanding a pause where necessary, providing space for reflection instead of immediate action. We must engage in open conversations about the implications of early decisions and the importance of allowing maturity to guide identity formation.

Eugene: Home to Malevolent Compassion

Welcome to the inaugural post of Eugene Voices, where we explore the vibrant community of Eugene, Oregon, through a conservative lens. Eugene, known for its lush landscapes and its residents' warm, open hearts, embodies the spirit of compassion. However, we find ourselves at a crossroads where well-intentioned efforts lead to unintended consequences.

The Spirit of Eugene: It's a Love/Hate

Eugene is a city built on ideals of acceptance and love. Our community is recognized for its willingness to help others, especially those most vulnerable. Eugenians have always stepped up to the plate, from local food drives to charity runs. This inherent goodness is what makes Eugene truly special. Having lived in three other communities throughout the US, I can say that Eugene is the best with the best heart.

The Compassion Pendulum Swings Too Far

However, the pendulum of compassion has swung too far, veering into the realm of malevolent compassion—where our attempts to help actually do more harm than good. This isn't a critique of our intentions but an observation of our outcomes.

What is Malevolent Compassion?

Malevolent compassion" is a term used to describe a situation where actions intended to help or show compassion actually result in negative consequences for those they are meant to assist. This concept critiques well-intentioned policies or efforts that, despite their benevolent aims, end up harming individuals or communities, often by enabling harmful behaviors, creating dependency, or failing to address deeper underlying issues.

The term highlights the unintended side effects of compassionate actions. For example, in social policy, efforts to provide support to homeless individuals through unrestricted aid might inadvertently discourage them from seeking long-term solutions such as rehabilitation or employment, thereby perpetuating the cycle of homelessness. Similarly, in educational or social contexts, policies designed to protect individuals from offensive or harmful speech might suppress open dialogue, resulting in a lack of resilience or understanding among differing viewpoints. Further- and we will dive deep into this more in other posts- is it truly compassionate to affirm to our teenagers that they are not their biological gender?

Malevolent compassion calls for a critical examination of the outcomes of compassionate policies, suggesting that good intentions need to be matched with effective and responsible strategies that truly benefit those in need.

The Homeless and Addiction Crisis

Eugene is facing a growing crisis in homelessness and addiction, exacerbated by policies that inadvertently enable rather than rehabilitate. For example, while the city has expanded resources for sheltering the homeless, less focus has been placed on long-term solutions to addiction and mental health issues that underpin much of the homelessness. As a result, we are not alleviating the problem; we're entrenching it. And just a short year after some drugs were decriminalized, our new governor has recriminalized these drugs.

Color us not surprised, right?

No matter where I'm driving our kids, we always see a few tents here and there and zombie-like addicts high and acting out. Numerous times, we've even seen these people shooting up, snorting, or performing sexual acts right there for the world to see. Is this truly compassion? Just letting these souls live however they want?

Rising Crime and Its Impact

With the increase in homelessness and drug addiction, Eugene has seen a corresponding rise in crime rates. This includes everything from petty thefts to more violent crimes, which erode the safety and quality of life for all residents. Our community's approach, focused more on temporary fixes than preventative measures, feeds into a cycle of crime and recovery that fails to address the root causes.

The Mental Health of Our Youth

Perhaps most distressingly, we are witnessing a staggering increase in depression and suicidal tendencies among our teens. Lane County's youth are struggling, caught in a vortex of social pressures exacerbated by the very programs meant to support them. Initiatives intended to foster inclusion and support are failing to address the critical issues of mental health care and emotional resilience, leaving our young people feeling more isolated than ever.

The Challenge of Youth Gender Identity

Another deeply complex issue facing our community is the increasing number of youths expressing a desire to change their gender identities. This topic, perhaps more than any other, requires us to balance compassion with caution. While well-intentioned, our instinct to affirm and support must also be guided by a commitment to protect our young people’s long-term well-being.

Compassion Versus Protection

In our eagerness to be supportive, there is a risk of rushing to affirm without sufficient exploration of the psychological, emotional, and physical implications such changes entail. The process of gender transition, particularly for minors, involves significant and often irreversible medical interventions. The rise in young people seeking gender transitions demands adults who will boldly speak the truth: "No, you were not born in the wrong body. You are exactly who you should be." "No, I will not use your preferred pronouns." "No, we will not change your name and let you use the opposite sexes bathroom."

Conclusion: A Call for Reevaluation

As much as we cherish our city's heart, it's crucial to recognize when our help is not helping. Eugene's journey toward an all-encompassing compassion must include a hard look at the outcomes of our actions. We advocate for a balanced approach that combines immediate support with sustainable strategies to lift our fellow Eugenians out of cycles of despair.

At Eugene Voices, we believe in the power of conversation and the exchange of ideas. We invite you to join in this dialogue, to think critically about our community's direction, and to work together towards solutions that truly benefit all of Eugene's residents. Together, we can turn our compassionate impulses into effective actions that uplift rather than unintentionally harm those we aim to help.